2002 AC Aceca vs. 1951 Saab 92
To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Saab 92 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (302 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 278 more horse power than 1951 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1951 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 AC Aceca weights approximately 705 kg more than 1951 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 AC Aceca | 1951 Saab 92 | |
Make | AC | Saab |
Model | Aceca | 92 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1951 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2480 mm |