2002 AC Aceca vs. 1954 Austin Princess
To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1954 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin Princess weights approximately 570 kg more than 2002 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin Princess. (252 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin Princess.
Compare all specifications:
2002 AC Aceca | 1954 Austin Princess | |
Make | AC | Austin |
Model | Aceca | Princess |
Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 3993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 252 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3360 mm |