2002 AC Aceca vs. 1956 Bugatti Type 101
To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Bugatti Type 101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Bugatti Type 101 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (302 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1956 Bugatti Type 101. (185 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1956 Bugatti Type 101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 AC Aceca weights approximately 70 kg more than 1956 Bugatti Type 101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 AC Aceca | 1956 Bugatti Type 101 | |
Make | AC | Bugatti |
Model | Aceca | Type 101 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 3257 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1440 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3310 mm |