2002 AC Aceca vs. 1958 DKW Munga
To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (302 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 259 more horse power than 1958 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 AC Aceca weights approximately 400 kg more than 1958 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 AC Aceca | 1958 DKW Munga | |
| Make | AC | DKW |
| Model | Aceca | Munga |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2010 mm |
