2002 AC Aceca vs. 1960 Mini MK I

To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mini MK I would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 316 more horse power than 1960 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1960 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 AC Aceca weights approximately 995 kg more than 1960 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 340 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2002 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mini MK I.

Compare all specifications: