2002 AC Aceca vs. 1966 Alvis TF
To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2002 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
2002 AC Aceca | 1966 Alvis TF | |
Make | AC | Alvis |
Model | Aceca | TF |
Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 247 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 64 L |