2002 AC Aceca vs. 1973 Zastava 2101

To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 288 more horse power than 1973 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1973 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 AC Aceca weights approximately 650 kg more than 1973 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2002 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Zastava 2101.

Compare all specifications:

2002 AC Aceca 1973 Zastava 2101
Make AC Zastava
Model Aceca 2101
Year Released 2002 1973
Engine Size 3506 cc 1198 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 350 HP 62 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 87 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1610 kg 960 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 4080 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2300 mm 2430 mm