2002 AC Aceca vs. 1974 Checker Aerobus
To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Checker Aerobus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Checker Aerobus would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Checker Aerobus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (302 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1974 Checker Aerobus. (185 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1974 Checker Aerobus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Checker Aerobus weights approximately 895 kg more than 2002 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Checker Aerobus (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 AC Aceca. (407 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1974 Checker Aerobus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
2002 AC Aceca | 1974 Checker Aerobus | |
Make | AC | Checker |
Model | Aceca | Aerobus |
Year Released | 2002 | 1974 |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 5733 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 463 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 6690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 4760 mm |