2002 AC Aceca vs. 1978 Audi Fox
To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Audi Fox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Audi Fox would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 AC Aceca weights approximately 698 kg more than 1978 Audi Fox.
Because 2002 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Audi Fox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 AC Aceca | 1978 Audi Fox | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Aceca | Fox |
Year Released | 2002 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 1272 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2550 mm |