2002 AC Aceca vs. 1978 Bristol 412

To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1978 Bristol 412. (171 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1978 Bristol 412. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Bristol 412 weights approximately 80 kg more than 2002 AC Aceca.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Bristol 412. (366 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Bristol 412.

Compare all specifications:

2002 AC Aceca 1978 Bristol 412
Make AC Bristol
Model Aceca 412
Year Released 2002 1978
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3506 cc 5898 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 350 HP 171 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 366 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 101.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81 mm 90.9 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.0:1 8.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1610 kg 1690 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 4950 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2300 mm 2910 mm