2002 AC Aceca vs. 1989 ZIL 4104
To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 ZIL 4104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 ZIL 4104 would be higher. At 7,690 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 ZIL 4104 (312 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2002 AC Aceca. (302 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 ZIL 4104 should accelerate faster than 2002 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 ZIL 4104 (607 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 AC Aceca. (407 Nm). This means 1989 ZIL 4104 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 AC Aceca. 1989 ZIL 4104 has automatic transmission and 2002 AC Aceca has manual transmission. 2002 AC Aceca will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 ZIL 4104 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 AC Aceca | 1989 ZIL 4104 | |
| Make | AC | ZIL |
| Model | Aceca | 4104 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 7690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 312 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 607 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 6350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2100 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3890 mm |
