2002 AC Aceca vs. 1989 ZIL 4104
To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 ZIL 4104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 ZIL 4104 would be higher. At 7,690 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (350 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1989 ZIL 4104. (312 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1989 ZIL 4104.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 ZIL 4104 (607 Nm) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 AC Aceca. (400 Nm). This means 1989 ZIL 4104 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 AC Aceca | 1989 ZIL 4104 | |
| Make | AC | ZIL |
| Model | Aceca | 4104 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3506 cc | 7690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 312 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 607 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 108 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 104.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 6350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2100 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3890 mm |
