2002 AC Aceca vs. 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo
To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (302 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. (256 HP @ 7200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 AC Aceca weights approximately 40 kg more than 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 AC Aceca | 1991 Alfa Romeo Proteo | |
| Make | AC | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Aceca | Proteo |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2959 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4150 mm |
