2002 AC Aceca vs. 1997 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura CL would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (350 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1997 Acura CL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 AC Aceca weights approximately 30 kg more than 1997 Acura CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 AC Aceca | 1997 Acura CL | |
| Make | AC | Acura |
| Model | Aceca | CL |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3506 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4826 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1781 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1389 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2715 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 65 L |
