2002 AC Aceca vs. 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 320 kg more than 2002 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
2002 AC Aceca | 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | AC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Aceca | Challenger |
Year Released | 2002 | 1997 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2730 mm |