2002 AC Aceca vs. 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser
To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (302 HP) has 187 more horse power than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. (115 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser.
Because 2002 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 AC Aceca (407 Nm) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser. (153 Nm). This means 2002 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 AC Aceca | 1998 Plymouth Pronto Cruiser | |
| Make | AC | Plymouth |
| Model | Aceca | Pronto Cruiser |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1600 cc |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 115 HP |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 153 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2650 mm |
