2002 AC Aceca vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (212 HP @ 4450 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 745 kg more than 2002 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Econoline. (393 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2002 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2002 AC Aceca | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | Econoline |
Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4450 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3510 mm |