2002 AC Aceca vs. 2001 Cadillac LMP
To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Cadillac LMP. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Cadillac LMP would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (302 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2001 Cadillac LMP. (300 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2001 Cadillac LMP.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 AC Aceca (407 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Cadillac LMP. (401 Nm). This means 2002 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Cadillac LMP. 2001 Cadillac LMP has automatic transmission and 2002 AC Aceca has manual transmission. 2002 AC Aceca will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Cadillac LMP will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 AC Aceca | 2001 Cadillac LMP | |
| Make | AC | Cadillac |
| Model | Aceca | LMP |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 401 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 1 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3090 mm |
