2002 AC Aceca vs. 2003 Volkswagen Bora
To start off, 2003 Volkswagen Bora is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (350 HP) has 261 more horse power than 2003 Volkswagen Bora. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2003 Volkswagen Bora.
Because 2002 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volkswagen Bora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 AC Aceca | 2003 Volkswagen Bora | |
Make | AC | Volkswagen |
Model | Aceca | Bora |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 1900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 55 L |