2002 AC Aceca vs. 2005 Bugatti Chiron
To start off, 2005 Bugatti Chiron is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 AC Aceca would be higher. At 6,255 cc (18 cylinders), 2005 Bugatti Chiron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Bugatti Chiron (547 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 2002 AC Aceca. (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Bugatti Chiron should accelerate faster than 2002 AC Aceca.
Because 2005 Bugatti Chiron is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Bugatti Chiron will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Bugatti Chiron (650 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 AC Aceca. (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Bugatti Chiron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 AC Aceca | 2005 Bugatti Chiron | |
| Make | AC | Bugatti |
| Model | Aceca | Chiron |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3506 cc | 6255 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 18 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | W |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 547 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 650 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1160 mm |
