2002 AC Aceca vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 AC Aceca would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2002 AC Aceca. (302 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2002 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 834 kg more than 2002 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 AC Aceca. (407 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
2002 AC Aceca | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Aceca | Armada |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 522 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 2344 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 106 L |