2002 AC Aceca vs. 2006 Acura CSX
To start off, 2006 Acura CSX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (302 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2006 Acura CSX. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2006 Acura CSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 AC Aceca weights approximately 197 kg more than 2006 Acura CSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 AC Aceca | 2006 Acura CSX | |
Make | AC | Acura |
Model | Aceca | CSX |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2700 mm |