2002 AC Aceca vs. 2008 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2008 Chrysler 300 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 2008 Chrysler 300. (190 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2008 Chrysler 300.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler 300. (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 AC Aceca | 2008 Chrysler 300 | |
| Make | AC | Chrysler |
| Model | Aceca | 300 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3506 cc | 2736 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 68 L |
