2002 AC Aceca vs. 2008 Ford F-450
To start off, 2008 Ford F-450 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 AC Aceca would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 350 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford F-450 (881 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 481 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 AC Aceca. (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
2002 AC Aceca | 2008 Ford F-450 | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | F-450 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 881 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 6670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 4390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 144 L |