2002 AC Aceca vs. 2010 Ford F-150
To start off, 2010 Ford F-150 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2010 Ford F-150. (248 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-150 weights approximately 729 kg more than 2002 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford F-150. (398 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford F-150.
Compare all specifications:
2002 AC Aceca | 2010 Ford F-150 | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | F-150 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 248 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 398 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 2339 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5885 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2004 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1887 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 98 L |