2002 AC Aceca vs. 2013 Audi A8
To start off, 2013 Audi A8 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (350 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2013 Audi A8. (328 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2013 Audi A8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Audi A8 weights approximately 220 kg more than 2002 AC Aceca.
Because 2013 Audi A8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Audi A8 (441 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 AC Aceca. (400 Nm). This means 2013 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
2002 AC Aceca | 2013 Audi A8 | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Aceca | A8 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 328 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 441 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 89.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5137 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2111 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2992 mm |