2002 AC Cobra vs. 1954 Buick 40
To start off, 2002 AC Cobra is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Cobra (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (148 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 615 kg more than 2002 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 AC Cobra (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Buick 40. (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2002 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 AC Cobra | 1954 Buick 40 | |
| Make | AC | Buick |
| Model | Cobra | 40 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3506 cc | 4328 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1675 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3110 mm |
