2002 AC Cobra vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2002 AC Cobra is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Cobra (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1030 kg more than 2002 AC Cobra.
Compare all specifications:
2002 AC Cobra | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | AC | Cadillac |
Model | Cobra | 62 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 98.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 2090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3300 mm |