2002 AC Cobra vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2002 AC Cobra is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 AC Cobra weights approximately 485 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 AC Cobra (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 AC Cobra | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | AC | Seat |
| Model | Cobra | 600 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3506 cc | 767 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2010 mm |
