2002 AC Cobra vs. 1986 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 2002 AC Cobra is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 140 kg more than 2002 AC Cobra.
Because 2002 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 AC Cobra | 1986 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | AC | Chrysler |
Model | Cobra | Le Baron |
Year Released | 2002 | 1986 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2560 mm |