2002 AC Cobra vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 AC Cobra would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 275 kg more than 2002 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 AC Cobra (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (301 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2002 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2002 AC Cobra | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | AC | Renault |
Model | Cobra | Clio |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 2946 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 301 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 82.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2520 mm |