2002 Acura CL vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (104 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 530 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura CL (315 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (156 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2002 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura CL | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Acura | Mazda |
Model | CL | Midge |
Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |