2002 Acura CL vs. 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura CL would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 500 kg more than 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Because 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura CL | 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Acura | Mitsubishi |
Model | CL | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1475 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2550 mm |