2002 Acura EL vs. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik
To start off, 2002 Acura EL is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Talbot Saoutchik (169 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2002 Acura EL. (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Talbot Saoutchik should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura EL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik weights approximately 620 kg more than 2002 Acura EL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Acura EL | 1952 Talbot Saoutchik | |
| Make | Acura | Talbot |
| Model | EL | Saoutchik |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 1668 cc | 4480 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3160 mm |
