2002 Acura EL vs. 1962 Mini MK I
To start off, 2002 Acura EL is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,668 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura EL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura EL (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1962 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1962 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura EL weights approximately 565 kg more than 1962 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura EL (156 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mini MK I. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2002 Acura EL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura EL | 1962 Mini MK I | |
Make | Acura | Mini |
Model | EL | MK I |
Year Released | 2002 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 156 Nm | 61 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2040 mm |