2002 Acura EL vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2002 Acura EL is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura EL (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 110 kg more than 2002 Acura EL.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura EL. (156 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Acura EL | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Acura | Nissan |
| Model | EL | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1668 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 156 Nm | 166 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
