2002 Acura EL vs. 1977 Volvo 66
To start off, 2002 Acura EL is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,668 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura EL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura EL (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1977 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1977 Volvo 66.
Because 1977 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura EL (156 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Acura EL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Acura EL | 1977 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Acura | Volvo |
| Model | EL | 66 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1668 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 156 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
