2002 Acura EL vs. 1983 Dodge 600
To start off, 2002 Acura EL is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura EL (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1983 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1983 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura EL weights approximately 15 kg more than 1983 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Dodge 600 (159 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura EL. (156 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1983 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura EL | 1983 Dodge 600 | |
Make | Acura | Dodge |
Model | EL | 600 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 156 Nm | 159 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2630 mm |