2002 Acura EL vs. 1986 Rover 825
To start off, 2002 Acura EL is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Rover 825. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Rover 825 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Rover 825 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura EL (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1986 Rover 825. (118 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1986 Rover 825. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Rover 825 weights approximately 296 kg more than 2002 Acura EL.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Rover 825 (268 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura EL. (156 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1986 Rover 825 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura EL | 1986 Rover 825 | |
Make | Acura | Rover |
Model | EL | 825 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 156 Nm | 268 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2770 mm |