2002 Acura EL vs. 2000 Pininfarina Rossa
To start off, 2002 Acura EL is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Pininfarina Rossa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Pininfarina Rossa would be higher. At 5,472 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Pininfarina Rossa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Pininfarina Rossa (485 HP) has 361 more horse power than 2002 Acura EL. (124 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Pininfarina Rossa should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura EL.
Because 2000 Pininfarina Rossa is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Pininfarina Rossa. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Pininfarina Rossa (570 Nm) has 414 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura EL. (156 Nm). This means 2000 Pininfarina Rossa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Acura EL | 2000 Pininfarina Rossa | |
| Make | Acura | Pininfarina |
| Model | EL | Rossa |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1668 cc | 5472 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 485 HP |
| Torque | 156 Nm | 570 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2510 mm |
