2002 Acura EL vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura EL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura EL would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura EL weights approximately 180 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura EL | 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
Make | Acura | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | EL | CLK GTR |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 4998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2680 mm |