2002 Acura EL vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura EL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura EL would be higher. At 1,668 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura EL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2002 Acura EL. (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura EL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura EL weights approximately 736 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura EL | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Acura | Westfield |
Model | EL | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 444 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2320 mm |