2002 Acura EL vs. 2009 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura EL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura EL would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Compass (156 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2002 Acura EL. (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura EL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Compass weights approximately 213 kg more than 2002 Acura EL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura EL (156 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jeep Compass. (141 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2002 Acura EL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura EL | 2009 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Acura | Jeep |
Model | EL | Compass |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 156 Nm | 141 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1393 kg |