2002 Acura RSX vs. 1946 Bristol 450
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1946 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1946 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RSX weights approximately 500 kg more than 1946 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Bristol 450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Bristol 450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1946 Bristol 450 | |
Make | Acura | Bristol |
Model | RSX | 450 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 54 L |