2002 Acura RSX vs. 1958 Buick 40
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,971 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Buick 40 weights approximately 610 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX.
Because 1958 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1958 Buick 40 | |
Make | Acura | Buick |
Model | RSX | 40 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 5971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3110 mm |