2002 Acura RSX vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 2002 Acura RSX. (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura RSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 996 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 392 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura RSX. (191 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura RSX. 1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2002 Acura RSX has manual transmission. 2002 Acura RSX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Acura RSX | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Acura | Cadillac |
| Model | RSX | 62 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 6381 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 325 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 191 Nm | 583 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1222 kg | 2218 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 75 L |
