2002 Acura RSX vs. 1959 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1959 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RSX weights approximately 450 kg more than 1959 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura RSX (193 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Triumph Herald. (84 Nm). This means 2002 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Acura RSX | 1959 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Acura | Triumph |
| Model | RSX | Herald |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 193 Nm | 84 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 29 L |
