2002 Acura RSX vs. 1961 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac Sixty. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 935 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX.
Because 1961 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 389 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura RSX. (193 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1961 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | RSX | Sixty |
Year Released | 2002 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 582 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 2165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3300 mm |