2002 Acura RSX vs. 1961 Jaguar MK X

To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Jaguar MK X (261 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2002 Acura RSX. (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura RSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 680 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1961 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Jaguar MK X (390 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura RSX. (193 Nm). This means 1961 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura RSX.

Compare all specifications: