2002 Acura RSX vs. 1964 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 860 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX.
Because 1964 Cadillac Eldorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Acura RSX | 1964 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Acura | Cadillac |
| Model | RSX | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 75 L |
